Posted by KC Elbows on April 07, 2003 at 07:24:15:
In Reply to: Re: Hmmmmmmmmm this is getting to be funny. RE: NEAL Fletcher posted by DC on April 07, 2003 at 04:02:15:
Actually, his logic is correct, however, yours is flawed. It amuses me greatly that you assume substantial additional traffic based solely off of the anti-moo going to your website. This is a fallacy. I've gone to your website once in the last two months, to check on a school that is no longer around. That's not a statistically relevant addition to your own traffic.
And because your website doesn't really change, there's not much reason for your students to go there, as they can read just about all the same stuff in the schools and the blue lit.
In addition, since, as you admit, many of the anti-moo are former long time members of your weird little group, we heard just about all the things on the website many many times, and have no real need to check the website except to confirm the death of a school, the alteration of the website in response to online accusations, and very rarely to get a direct quote to discredit your founder, though, frankly, we can get those quotes from the blue lit on our website.
Statistically, the anti-moo clicks add nothing to the traffic on your website.
On the flip side, bullshido gets traffic from a number of sources. A number of members of the largest martial arts forum in the world, KFM, are also members of Bullshido, as are members of one of the most influential grappler's forum, ADCC.
On the flip side, no significant representation from either forum seems to frequent the moo website except for a chuckle.
On the flip side, there are moo on bullshido.com. If you count the moo by their ip addresses, there are many- however, the writing style in all those is consistently poor in exactly the same way, so I can only assume it's the same person using proxy servers, a la the Notes site.
However, if I count by ip addresses, then the moo have a significant membership on Bullshido. Which suggests that it's a forum frequented by grapplers, traditionalists, and moos, whereas the moo website is only frequented by the moo in any significant numbers, and since it doesn't really change, I can't imagine even they visit it that frequently.
*;
=qq(