Recent trends in Asia indicate that, maybe,
the peoples in the region are beginning
to change their attitudes towards their
leaders.
Indonesians forced Suharto out and the
present leader President Abdurrahman
Wahid is barely holding on to power after
his name was linked to a few corruption
scandals.
In the Philippines, the people helped
prevent further backsliding into
the old ways of kickbacks and pocket-lining
by staging another EDSA people's power
revolution.
People power has shown up in Nepal,
South Korea, Taiwan and other countries
throughout the area over the last
decade or so.
The old practice was for the common people
in Asian countries
to pretty much tolerate authoritarian
leaders.
These leaders often had near absolute
power including the ability to enlarge
their personal bank accounts via the
state coffers.
In the early days, after the developing
nations had thrown off the yoke
of European colonialism, this attitude
was not devoid of sense.
The people were worried about
maintaining sovereignty and
security in a Cold War world.
Strong leaders were desired
regardless if these leaders
were honest or not.
And not all were corrupt. What
they all seemed to share was
a mandate by the people to rule
with an iron hand.
To a some extent, the authoritarian
rule of these leaders helped lift
Asia into its position as the
fastest-growing region in the
world.
But absolute power corrupts
and a corrupt leader with
absolute power can do a lot
of damage.
And if the leadership at
the top is bad, you can bet
there's a lot of shady
business at lower levels
of government.
So, one can't help but think
that the new attitude in Asia
is a good development.
Certainly it will cause
some short-term instability
but in the long-run it will
create more honest, efficient
and accountable governance.