Posted by KC Elbows on February 19, 2003 at 07:24:46:
In Reply to: Re: Maybe here posted by Larry on February 18, 2003 at 22:28:40:
'No but he has yet to prove anything he has ever stated here.'
Okay, let's cover my key arguments, which I've stuck with for a very long time:
1) the burden of proof for Kim's 11 story fall is on Kim, and he has failed to uphold that burden, therefore the preponderance of evidence(this evidence generally called gravity and impact) says that story is a lie.
2) the burden of proof for the all asia tournament is on Kim, and since he has faile dto uphold that burden, the preponderance of evidence(the impossibility of a competition including representatives from all of asia during the cold war era, and the lack of a single known fighter's presence at said competition) says that THAT story is a lie.
3) as can be seen on your website, an us vs. them philosophy is pushed, in the form of the pa doe vs. chung doe section, as well as the idea of fabricated movement vs. supposedly real movement, as well as by the huge number of former members who can attribute meaning to the word 'missing' that is not a meaning used by non moos, not to mention do chi, no mind, goofy type, walking dead, etc.
The burden of proof for the first two points is on Kim, and I have satisfied the burden of proof for the last one. Explain to me again what I have not proven of these key arguments.