Posted by KC Elbows on March 03, 2003 at 12:39:22:
In Reply to: Re: You're a rogue? posted by Mooliwan on March 03, 2003 at 12:20:08:
'So are we, doh.'
Seeing as how your handle has never shown up here before, the above is gibberish. We? And which handles would 'we' be?
'That still doesn't improve your args any here.'
Oh, so you've seen the 11 story fall? Of course not. My arguments don't need improving, your vision is the only thing lacking.
'Nor does it make me want to slander my former teachers.'
A 'pro-mooo' poster earlier said Tom McGee went crazy, and I didn't see you jumping up to defend him. And I've never slandered any of my instructors. I've just called Kim what he is. Kim was never my instructor, which is my good luck.
The fact is, your old teacher slandered you guys the minute you left. Right here, on this forum.
Over and over. You know you're the pa doe, according to the website. You know that you are 'the experiment' that is talked about on the website.
That's working on the assumption that you are rogues, which seems assinine. The main org dragged the rogues through the mud. However, it would be typical of people who recently left to show the kind of respect to Kim that he'd neither show back, or deserve.