Re: Samuel

[Home] [Chat] [Forums] [Search] [ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Martial Arts Table Talk ]

Posted by KC Elbows on March 04, 2003 at 13:05:46:

In Reply to: Re: Samuel posted by Observer on March 04, 2003 at 12:52:31:

'You are foolish. That is not Jerry's personality. NAyone on either side of this argument that has met him knows that.'

Sorry, that's a fallacy. The ranking anti-mooos all seem to think he would do this sort of thing for Kim. Try just speaking for your group, they're easier to predict.

'Martial Arts principles existed before the internet, too. since we are on the internet, pictures will do.'

Again, pictures are not part of martial arts principles, skill in fighting is the sum of the martial implications of all martial principles, and all social/moral/spritual benefits are in tandem with skill in fighting, and in no way exclusive or separate. This is not wisdom as per me, this is followed by Shaolin and Templar and samarai other orders of warrior monk, and they are the source of the warrior-scholar-monk conept, and the most advanced display of it, NOT the moo.

'Fine. Yo made a challenge that nay school boy would make and then expect the world to come to you. It won't happen. It is out of the way and not worth it. Those terms of the challenge will not be met and the 'challenge' is declined. You are a meathead and will not take the initative. You are very foolish.'

You are not in authority to answer for all students and instructors of the moo. The challenge still stands. Someday I hope to see a moo with courage. You are clearly not one.


Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

[Home] [Chat] [Forums] [Search] [ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Martial Arts Table Talk ]