Posted by KC Elbows on April 02, 2003 at 11:56:18:
In Reply to: I've never seen it either posted by Reporter on April 02, 2003 at 11:23:06:
'If I had proof, what would it change? I would still need to go ing tomorrow and work on the same things I'm working on now.'
If you had proof it DIDN'T happen, say something like, the building it was taken from not being 11 stories tall, or the guy who took the pics said it was just a jump kick, then it would definitely change what you were working on, because what you were working on, if you have any sense in your head, would not be determined by someone who lied about jumping from an 11 story building and made that lie something you saw before you entered the school EVERY DAY, and you definitely wouldn't leave your training plan up to people who take that lie on face value and also use the picture that represented that lie to represent them online, at the schools, and on their brochures.
No, if you had such proof, you'd find credible people to help you learn, not a bunch of people who stuck in the same system on faith because they never bothered to actually research for themselves.
After all, if the jump ain't important, why not take it down, just like we've been asking?
'Your own confidence in what you do shouldn't have to come from proof or acceptance from others.'
This does not preclude you finding proof for yourself. The only ones to seek out such proof are out of the system by choice. Make of that what you will. Kim told them that he'd show the technique to them if they jumped first. Sound like an evasion to you? If it doesn't, then I suggest you start thinking more critically. I guess he'd rather have a fanatic die than have to prove his claims. It's lucky that Joe J. wouldn't REALLY die for Kim, eh?
*; =qq(