Posted by KC Elbows on April 08, 2003 at 13:20:28:
Hey, I received this history of the moo today, it was made by the moo(Oom Yung Doe era moo, about a year old, so post TD and KK), and I was wondering if any of you moos would like to comment on these things I noticed about it:
1) The history doesn't go back any further than 1970.
2) The history says that instructors took the fall for all higher belts in the school in the tax case, but fails to mention that Kim was also convicted.
3) The history blames all problems on confused communication between Kim and the levels beneath him.
4) The history fails to reconcile how #3 above could cause #2 above to occur, or what was miscommunicated that lead the instructors to strap money to their legs and deliver said money out of state while not properly reporting it to the IRS.
5) The history claims that Kim taught instructors only six times a year in the first half of the eighties, and infers that he was in Texas, and not instructing, in the second half, which is strange, because we were told in the late eighties he was teaching.
6) The history makes it appear that Orience, NPG, and other companies had nothing to do with Kim.
Care to comment? Does your history go back further than 1970? Can you provide any independent data to suggest it does? Also, what did Kim communicate that was misunderstood to mean 'strap money to your leg and drive it to another state without reporting it to the IRS'? And finally, if Kim had nothing to do with those companies, and didn't own the schools, if they had nothing to do with Kim, and schools were independantly owned, and Kim was not teaching anywhere but maybe Texas in the late eighties, where was Kim's income coming from?
Just curious. I'll post the hisotry itself on the yahoo group tomorrow for those who want to peruse it themselves.
*; =qq(