Posted by Steve on April 25, 2003 at 15:34:59:
In Reply to: Re: Gossip and Fools posted by KWONBOP on April 25, 2003 at 14:39:18:
Let's see. Where to start.
Grandstanding? Examples please?
Lack of cohesive comprehension? What is that? Comprehension that sticks together? Cohesive, as it pertains to comprehension, would be used in conjunction with ideas. E.g., the ideas that JCK presents give a cohesive picture of his egomaniacal nature. Are you saying that I can't comprehend cohesive arguments, or that I'm unable to create cohesive arguments? You can't be saying my comprehension isn't cohesive, because that doesn't make any sense. What's the noun?
What actions of mine are you referring to? The ones where I point out the total lack of substance to your posts, or some other action? I'm not sure how you can judge a man by his posts on a message board, but then, your master claims to be able to judge a person by his picture. In either case, we call that judging a book by its cover - a very short-sighted process.
I'm sorry, Kwonbopeidope, that you are unable to carry on a conversation with someone who asks you the simple question, 'is there any wrong that your instructors can do'? You know, really, you could have just said, 'yes', or, 'no', and left it at that.
I guess that you see no point to discussing the issue because it won't change your philosophy of action in any case. Your philosphy is to follow the line, no matter what that line does, and regardless of whether or not you are more qualified than the individual above you. In your world, qualification is represented by degress of black and stripes. That's just not a reality that I understand anymore. So maybe you're right - I have no cohesive comprehension, because you have no cohesive system.