Thursday, October 23, 2008

Nouriel Roubini: Hedge fund could vanish Darwin-style



In a speech before hedge fund managers in London today economics professor Nouriel Roubini predicted a run on hedge funds that could result in 30 percent of the hedge fund assets disappearing in a "fairly Darwinian manner."

The impact on the stocks could be so severe that the market would have to be closed for a week or more.

Roubini predicted the current crash in 2006.

He predicts the worse recession in 40 years that will last at least 24 months in the United States. Roubini sees a vicious cycle occurring between the financial sector and the "real economy." Because of the tsunami of mortgage foreclosures, he suggests that the government help homeowners as they did during the Great Depression.

He sees a 40 percent drop in home prices, which would be worse than the Great Depression. And he thinks at least $3 trillion will be needed in bailouts to prevent a systemic banking failure.



Nouriel Roubini on Bloomberg TV

Labels: , , , , , ,

Friday, October 17, 2008

Comment: Just like in the movies



A third of the way through this video they have Max Keiser's prediction on al-Jazeera more than a year ago that Iceland's debt bubble would burst. A spokesperson from one of Iceland's recently nationalized banks is featured in the video.

Also, featured is a British economist who notes how saving one's money over the last several years was strongly discouraged in the Wall Street economic model. People and companies were supposed to spend, not only all the money they had earned, but they were to borrow feverishly to spend even more.

Spending and borrowing in America was even pushed as patriotic, and therefore saving one's earned money and not spending borrowed money could be seen as unpatriotic.

This reminds me of the old Frank Capra movie "It's a Wonderful Life," an American favorite during the holiday season. In the movie, a small family bank, in the days before the start of the Great Depression, provides housing loans for hard-working people who had saved enough to make their down payments. The loans were possible because of others who saved their money in interest-bearing accounts waiting for the day that they too could purchase their own homes.

However, the big evil banking family in town is involved in get-rich-quick real estate schemes. Yes, there was plenty of real estate speculation leading up to the Great Depression as well.

After an unfortunate accident, the big banking family gets an opportunity to put the squeeze on the small banking family. However, in the end all those people that had been helped by the latter in buying their homes come to the rescue. They all contribute a bit to help bail out the small-guy honest family who had played by the rules.

The difference with the current situation is that it is the big bankers -- the Wall Street tycoons -- who are getting bailed out, not by the citizens of Smallville but by their friends in Washington.

Like the small town families in "It's a Wonderful Life," who owned much to the local honest banker, the Washington politicians are deeply "indebted" to the Wall St. fat cats who have funded their campaigns.

However, in this real life version, the little guy ends up getting kicked in the pants. The mortgage owners are getting little or no relief. Apparently they committed a grave error in not keeping the good times rolling when they couldn't meet their balloon payments.

Labels: , ,

Wednesday, October 08, 2008

Comment: Do bailouts actually prolong downturns?

There is probably no better historical example to examine this question as the Great Depression, when the government intervened for more than a decade trying to prop up the financial system.

Although the Great Depression is generally seen as starting at the stock market crash of 1929 from at least 1929, small banks and farms had been floundering severely. However, it was not until 1931, when the government started a massive bailout program with the National Credit Corporation (NCC) that things started going downhill very quickly.

In 1932, the NCC was replaced with the Reconstruction Finance Corporation (RFC) and things continued to spiral downward reaching the lowest point during the Depression in 1933.

Yet, the RFC continued its bailout program mostly unsuccessfully until America's entry into World War II, generally seen as the point when shortly afterward the Depression ended completely. During the war, the RFC continued to operate giving out $2 billion a year. From 1932 until 1941, the RFC gave out $9.465 billion, a lot of money in those days.

When the war started, the government drafted many of the employed workers, and hired and trained large numbers of unskilled workers, at its own expense, to work in wartime factories. These policies together with rationing and a greater worker discipline helped the country work out of the lingering unemployment that still plagued the country. The stock market did not recover its pre-crash position though until 1954.

Some groups of economists, like those of the Austrian School, who believe that government intervention only prolonged the problems in the economy. Others, like the Monetarists, believe the Federal Reserve did not act quickly and strongly enough to address the crisis.

During the Depression, the Fed followed a deflationary strategy that kept interest rates high. The current Fed chief, Ben Bernanke, believes more in an low interest rate strategy, an attempt to ease credit, but in effect putting upward pressure on inflation.

Bernanke's views may account for today's cut in interest rates, another attempt by the government to bend over backward in accommodating the credit markets. However, as with the Great Depression, it is impossible to deny that easy credit is responsible for the current economic crisis.

Attempts at propping up the easy credit market, then, only reinforce the causative factors according to one school of thought.

The fact that the stock markets have not reacted positively to the torrent of government measures aimed at propping up the easy credit system probably indicates some doubt over the policy.

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Friday, September 26, 2008

Comment: The Failed Bailout of the Great Depression

Some analysts have astutely commented that the recent bailouts including that of massive AIG failed to do what was expected of them. They did not calm down the markets as promised by the administration.

Will the much larger bailout plan currently in negotiations fare differently? Is it simply a matter of throwing more money at the problem?

If we look at the historical example of the Great Depression, we find that government attempts at propping up the free market do not work.

Following the panic of 1929, the federal government made numerous attempts to stem the tide of bank failures. This culminated in the formation of the RFC by the Hoover administration in 1932 and this was further supported by Roosevelt who came into power in 1933. The RFC was tasked basically with bailing out struggling large businesses and banks.

Well, obviously the strategy didn't work. The Great Depression continued for another decade until the general mobilization during World War II.

The difference between that bailout and the current one, is the Great Depression scheme occurred together with sharp deflation of prices, while the current one is happening in inflation-based environment.

A bailout could worsen inflationary problems, which was not a problem during the Great Depression when prices were sagging and hurting business people. The country will largely have to rely on foreigners to finance the debt needed for the Paulson plan.

Labels: , ,


Add to Technorati Favorites!

Add to Google

Subscribe in NewsGator Online

If you have Google or Yahoo! toolbars, drag this link into your bookmarks toolbar to bookmark this page.


Add to reddit
Add to Digg

Press Ctrl + D to add to your browser bookmarks.